The Shadowy Game of Natural Gas

Russia is again threatening to cut off natural gas supplies to Ukraine. It says the reason is accumulated debt on the part of its neighbor. Gazprom, the Kremlin’s stalking horse, says Tuesday morning is the deadline – pay $1.5 billion, or lose a quarter of your supply. Talks are supposed to be going on in Moscow.

No one is opening up his accounting books, so we don’t know the true state of affairs on the two countries’ balance sheet. But there are enough dribs and drabs to get a picture of what’s at least partly going on.

This partial answer is Rosurkenergo. An entirely opaque go-between company – half-owned by Gazprom, and the other half by Ukrainian businessmen – Rosurkenergo buys natural gas from Turkmenistan sells it on to Ukraine.

Ukraine says it will pay off whatever debt it owes if the deal with Rosurkenergo is severed. But last week, a Gazprom official named Ilya Kochevrin told the Financial Times that, if that happens, Ukraine should expect a steep hike in its bill.

That line is probably not straight out of Mario Puzo, but it could be. One might rationally ask why a joint Gazprom-Ukrainian company is more capable of negotiating cheap gas than Gazprom and Ukraine directly.

One thing to note is that it has seemed that the Kremlin is attempting to get a lot of its financial house in order before the ascension of Dmitri Medvedev to the Russian presidency in next month’s elections.

Vladimir Putin, for example, has been peripatetic in his efforts to get Gazprom's pipeline deals with Central Asia and Europe sealed fast.

It’s also been a principal suspicion in the recent arrest of Russian mobster Semyon Mogilevich, an internationally hunted fugitive who lived for years in plain sight in Moscow before Russian authorities miraculously charged him last month with tax evasion. Mogilevich has been linked as a possible shareholder in Rosurkenergo, which if true could mean that his arrest was related to the company, and how and with whom the proceeds are shared.

This is all Kreminology. At the intersection of commerce, crime and geopolitics, such questions in the end get resolved. But what of the collateral victims, such as Europe? Gazprom claims this is just between Russia and Ukraine, and has assured Europe – which receives 80% of its Russian gas through Ukraine – that its supply won’t be affected.

Does anyone really believe that Ukraine won’t pass on the crunch to Europe in order to build up leverage?

Photo: dbking
Rights: Creative Commons

The Trouble With Being a Mobster

The Semyon Mogilevich story is becoming more intriguing. Over the weekend, Cathy Scott-Clark and Adrian Levy at the Guardian in London weighed in with a long piece linking the notorious alleged mobster to the assassination of former Russian intelligence officer Alexander Litvinenko.

Mogilevich, who has been on the FBI most-wanted list for years, was arrested last Thursday on tax charges in Moscow. Russian authorities said they had long been looking for Mogilevich, who has lived for years in plain sight in the Russian capital. There is much conjecture on why he was arrested just now. Some of it involves supposed efforts to unwind the shadowy natural gas trade between Russia and Ukraine, in which Mogilevich appeared to have a role.

The Guardian story is quite an involved piece of journalism. The top half is background, but it then picks up with a tale of Litvinenko investigating Mogilevich, who according to the piece griped about it to his FSB pals, who got angry at Litvinenko … well, you get the picture. It all ends with Litvinenko having polonium 210 dropped into his tea in November 2006.

I have to note the remarkable coincidence of two huge Mogilevich stories breaking at precisely the same time. First his arrest, and now the accusation of involvement in one of the biggest murder cases of recent years.

One can be certain that the FSB is scouring its voluminous unsolved case file for items to hang on the unsympathetic Mogilevich.