Guest Column: U.S. Media Turbulence Points to New Day in Central Asian Journalism
Nonetheless, Sasha Meyer sees a reason for optimism on the Caspian. It lies, Meyer writes, in the technology that is transforming journalism in the West. His report:
By Sasha Meyer
Earlier this year, the Project for Excellence in Journalism, reported, ”Power is shifting to the individual journalist and away, by degrees, from journalistic institutions. ... Through search, e-mail, blogs, social media and more, consumers are gravitating to the work of individual writers and voices, and away somewhat from institutional brand. Journalists who have left legacy news organizations are attracting funding to create their own websites.” At least some reporters now enjoy “a new prospect: individual journalists, funded by a mix of sources, offering expert coverage to many places.”
This is similar to what happened in the Silicon Valley in the 1990s, when power shifted from investment firms to engineers, which itself echoed the experience of the movie industry a few decades earlier. As Michael Lewis wrote in The New New Thing, ”Once the studios lost their clout, the stars seized power. And once they'd seized power they raised their price and demanded the right to direct their own pictures.”
This trend is painful for Western journalists. Reforming institutions such as newspapers that have not seen any change since the invention of the telegraph means a lot of jobs will be lost before a renewed industry emerges.
However, for those who support independent news reporting in places like
One example is Christopher Allbritton's approach to covering the
Another example is GlobalPost, an online for-profit startup launched this year, whose stated mission is "to redefine international news for the digital age." Instead of sending reporters abroad, the publication relies on the network of 65 part-time correspondents who are already there. Its subscription service called Passport seeks to make the journalist the central figure, Elizabeth Jensen reported in The New York Times. "It offers access to GlobalPost correspondents, including exclusive reports on business topics of less interest to general audiences, conference calls and meetings with reporters, and breaking news e-mail messages from those journalists," Jensen wrote. Miriam Elder has written on Central Asia for the GlobalPost.
This expansion of the reporters' role, coupled with the trend among U.S. newspapers to outsource foreign coverage, offers new opportunities for journalists in Central Asia. Foundations and NGOs that support independent media in the region can help them to take advantage of these opportunities by providing two missing ingredients: training and marketing.
Strong journalistic skills are still scarce in the region. Oleg Panfilov, director of the Center for Journalism in Extreme Situations, said in an interview that the quality of reporting has much room for improvement. American and European journalism schools could play a role here by doing for journalists in places like Central Asia what MIT has done for engineers worldwide: make course contents available online for anyone to use. The MIT effort called OpenCourseWare has been popular with geeks across the planet and led to similar projects at other schools, helping create an international consortium and a global movement.
Once trained, the local reporters would still need help making themselves known to international news media and gaining credibility and trust, another challenge their Western supporters could help to overcome.
The domestic audience in the region would also benefit, thanks to a form of a cross-subsidy. Working part-time for a foreign publication like GlobalPost would provide the journalist with time and money to research and report for news sites whose audience is ordinary people in the region. Furthermore, the reporter's work published abroad would still reach the region as such content typically gets picked up by local bloggers.
Labels: Kazakhstan, media crisis, uzbekistan


2 Comments:
Interesting article. Although I see how living in the digital age can revolutionize reporting in Central Asia it does not solve the problem of journalists being targeted. They always will be targeted in this region as long as they are writing regardless of the medium the journalist(s) is/are using.
I have to disagree with your statement that strong journalistic skills are scarce. If you go to Eurasianet.org, most of the contributors on that web site are from Central Asia. It is not that they are scarce, but that they are prohibited from producing or publishing material. Even then, if material is published, we would never see it. The absence of journalism here, does not mean it is absent there.
solace3225,
Thank you for your comments. You are right that technology doesn't solve the problem of journalists' safety. But apparently it can help protect them. Dmitry Muratov, the editor-in-chief of Novaya Gazeta, in a recent online QA with readers mentions that the newspaper, which has lost more reporters to contract killings than any other, uses "technological measures" with regards to a number of its employees.
You are also right that Eurasianet.org has some excellent contributors from the region. However, the ratio (a dozen or so good reporters out of population of 60 million) is a sign of a scarcity. And the complaint Oleg Panfilov made in the linked interview was that reporters routinely take sides in political battles, a practice which should effectively disqualify them as journalists. This tendency suggests there is a widespread misunderstanding among journalists of what journalism is about.
Sorry about the tardy response.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home