• Steve LeVine covers foreign affairs for Business Week. He previously was correspondent for Central Asia and the Caucasus for The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times for 11 years. His first book, The Oil and the Glory, a history of the former Soviet Union through the lens of oil, was published in October 2007. Putin’s Labyrinth, his new book, profiles Russia through the lives and deaths of six Russians. The updated paperback was released in April 2009.



    To Install the O&G Newsfeed on Your Site, Click "Get Widget" Below

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner



    A Blog on Russia, Energy, the Caspian and
    Beyond

    Wednesday, July 8, 2009

    Obama in Moscow: A Cool Reception, and a Dose of Putin

    President Barack Obama employed his signature moves -- the candid town hall address; the glamorous wife and daughters -- and to be sure Russian President Dmitry Medvedev seemed to lap it up. But in the end Russia is not Cairo, nor Berlin. This is not 1994, when then-President Bill Clinton led some Moscow women to swoon. In place of the intrigued, still-fascinated eyes of the 1990s, Obama was met largely with disinterest from the Russian public, and the wagging finger of Prime Minister Vladimir Putin in private. In short, he fell flat.

    That's a dose of reality. In the best of times, on most topics, the best that can be expected in a U.S.-Russia relationship is probably respectful disagreement.

    “We don’t really understand why Obama is such a star,” 25-year-old Kirill Zagorodnov, a student at Moscow's New Economic School, told Clifford Levy and Ellen Barry of The New York Times. “It’s a question of trust, how he behaves, how he positions himself, that typical charisma, which in Russia is often parodied. Russians really are not accustomed to it. It is like he is trying to manipulate the public.”

    Stefan Wagstyl of the Financial Times heard the same story from the students he collared after Obama's speech at the school yesterday. But Nikolai Petrov of Moscow's Carnegie Center also cautioned Wagstyl not to go too far with his analysis: "These students are not typical. They are mostly mathematics specialists," Petrov said.

    While this slap of reality was telling, probably the most important meeting of Obama's Moscow trip was his two-hour breakfast with Putin. By Wagstyl's description, it appears that Putin put on one of his bravura performances. Putin has been wowing Westerners for years with his three-hour, no-notes discourses on Russian affairs at the annual Valdai Discussion Club. Now Obama got a taste of Putin's presence of mind.

    Obama's takeaway? Putin is "tough, smart, shrewd, very unsentimental, very pragmatic." And also in charge.

    Labels: , , ,

    posted by Steve at

    7 Comments:

    Anonymous Timothy Post said...

    Steve, you're in danger of becoming the "class smart aleck" of Russia Watchers. You sit in the back of the class and criticize everyone.

    Please enlighten us on what you would have liked to have seen during Obama's very first visit to Moscow.

    If you think it was a failure then pretend your were in Michael McFaul's shoes last week and you were briefing Obama. What would have been your primary objective for Obama?

    We're all ears.

    July 8, 2009 3:07 PM  
    Blogger aser said...

    Video diary of Barack Obama, Russia 2009
    The latest news, facts, curious.
    You can watch here:Barack Obama-Russia 2009-online video

    July 8, 2009 3:15 PM  
    Blogger Steve said...

    Hi Tim, thanks for the comment. Frankly I'm not clear on which criticism or sarcasm you mean. In this posting, there is the observation that Obama's style doesn't travel everywhere, and in this case did not in Russia; that isn't a criticism. In the previous coverage of the visit, I've pointed out that, while the arms control agreement offers a chance to unthaw the relationship, the other main moving parts -- Georgia, missile defense and so on -- are not going to change. Again, not a criticism.

    There are stabs at humor -- on Medvedev's doe-eyed thrill of recognition on the world stage; on Putin's usual charmless expression.

    Obama did blunder I think with his early shot at separating Medvedev from Putin; this tactic, initiated under Bush, will not work. There simply is no space between the two men. That must be why Obama dropped it.

    In the end, however, it is as stated -- I see both sides as having little on their wish lists. McFaul, like his predecessors, wants Moscow to go along with the U.S. agenda; Moscow wants respect.

    And your take?

    Meanwhile, thanks Aser for the link.

    July 8, 2009 3:49 PM  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    STEVE !!!!!

    acer's link set off my up to date Avast Anti-virus.

    I can't be sure it was a false positive ... but head's up.

    RBM

    July 8, 2009 11:18 PM  
    Anonymous Reaganite Republican said...

    And the worst is yet to come- In '78 Jimmy Carter met with Brezhnev, extending his hand in friendship much as Obama is doing in Russia today. After seeing what kind of a zero they were dealing with firsthand, the Soviet Union promptly invaded Afghanistan- in direct violation of promises made to Carter in Moscow six months earlier.

    It is hard to imagine today's Kremlin being cowed or intimidated after meeting with a smiley plastic mannequin like Obama, putting his arm around them and schmoozing all the time- they know he's not going to do anything.

    Yes We Can invade Ukraine... and what are you going to do about it?

    http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com

    July 9, 2009 8:55 AM  
    Blogger Steve said...

    All: Please note notice by RBM that Aser's link (above) may be virus-infected!

    July 9, 2009 3:53 PM  
    Blogger Steve said...

    Welcome RR: Just to set the record straight, Reagan as far as I recall invaded one country (Grenada). Meanwhile, he quietly withdrew from Lebananon after a decent interval following the barracks bombing.

    History is written by the victors. Just in case this item is also on your mind: I am in agreement with Gorbachev that the Soviet Union's final demise was triggered by the disastrous collapse in oil prices in the late 1980s, which finally pulled the rug out from under the rotten, subsidy-supported economy.

    One can credit Reagan for much; but he was also much-challenged by rogues. As all presidents are.

    July 9, 2009 5:01 PM  

    Post a Comment

    Links to this post:

    Create a Link

    << Home