In Praise of a Bygone Era
A friend lent me a copy of a new book, My Three Fathers, a page-turner that chronicles a now-lost era of drawing room Washington socializing and respectful secrecy about the private sexual and other foibles of highly public figures. It's by Bill Patten, the father of the best man at my Almaty wedding, Sam Patten (and the lender of the book).Flipping through the index after reading this and that personal account of JFK, FDR and other American aristocrats, I came upon a fascinating passage on page 203. It recounts a 1957 frolic in Moscow by Joe Alsop (one of the three fathers in the title), the staunch and powerful anti-Communist columnist. O and G readers are familiar with Moscow's surveillance methods, and no doubt Alsop was, too. Yet there he was, caught on camera "cavorting in a hotel room with another man." The Soviets attempted to blackmail Alsop -- Patten doesn't say what exactly they wanted from him -- but he "refused to cooperate." Alsop had gone to Harvard with Chip Bohlen, who at the time was the U.S. ambassador in Moscow. Bohlen got Alsop out of the country fast, and though the Soviets funneled the pictures to The Washington Post, an editor there "simply threw [them] in the trash." As Patten writes, "This degree of respect for privacy seems almost unimaginable today."
I heard Patten speak at the bookstore Politics & Prose. As the title suggests, he has a captivating personal story. (For those interested, the other two fathers of the title are William Patten, who until 1995 the author thought was his father, and the British aristocrat Duff Cooper, who his mother, Susan, finally confessed actually was.)
Labels: bill patten, bohlen, my three fathers, soviets


2 Comments:
An extremely shy O and G-er sent the following email, declining to post but allowing me to unattributed. It's something we all might keep in mind:
Steve--Chip Bohlen is also the source of one of the best quotes about Russia--"There is no expert knowledge of Russia--only varying degrees of ignorance"
I have read your blog and listened to you and the "anything goes" theme regarding Russia is recurrent. I am not a Red Basher, but it would seem to me that a nation that truly practices that paradigm and does not play by the rules of the game, and then is handed unimaginable wealth and resources, can be a very dangerous nation. I mean, what does 'anything' mean?
We know it means murder, even on a scale of hundreds or thousands, but what if their national interests butt squarely against our own? How far would they go? I could easily see a very very violent, even catastrophic outcome. Like you, I am worried that the missile defense shield as proposed, is such an unnecessary line in the sand for them. I see us back at the MAD, (Mutually Assured Destruction) scenario. I see only the consequence of destruction as sufficient motivation to get them to back down.
Am I overly gloomy? To me 'anything goes' means, 'I will never loose.' No give-and-take. No compromise. Is this the Russian leadership mindset? What can a civil society do to protect itself against such a mentality; especially when he is so popular at home?
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home