Serbia, Bulgaria and the World
Vladimir Putin today racked up another in a string of unbroken victories in the European Pipeline War. Serbia has sold Gazprom a majority stake in the state oil company, NIS, and joined Russia's South Stream Pipeline consortium. Last week, Bulgaria signed onto South Stream as well.The pipeline is part of Putin's strategy to cement Russia's domination of Europe's energy market, which receives around a third of its oil and natural gas from Russia. Ultimately at stake is political influence in Europe, as Andrew Ross Sorkin discussed today in The New York Times.
The United States and the European Union oppose Russia gaining more of a foothold in Europe, but Putin has far eclipsed their rival Nabucco pipeline project, which would feed natural gas from Turkmenistan to Europe.
Putin's triumphs stem from his personal role in the energy strategy. He himself has flown to Central Asia, to eastern Europe and elsewhere numerous times to court the presidents of the transit countries personally. He even got former German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder to chair a companion pipeline, called Nord Stream.
Europe and the United States meanwhile have barely gotten started. In recent days, the State Department has discussed a new name to lead the Western effort -- Bush family friend Donald Evans -- but there is legitimate doubt that he has sufficient star power to upstage Putin. The U.S. presidential election may push the issue even further back on the Western agenda.
For a contrarian view of the issue, read this piece by Stratfor, which argues that the Bulgaria deal shows that Russia is actually losing the pipeline war. I personally think this analysis is upside down, but afficionados of pipeline politics should hear all sides.
Photo: pingnews.com
Rights: Creative Commons
Labels: Caspian, gas pipeline, nord stream, oil, Putin, Russia, south stream, Turkmenistan


5 Comments:
Steve,
The good news is the Turkmen-Azeri ties are improving. They've just resolved the issue of Azeri debt to Turkmenistan. And Azerbaijan is eager as ever to become a transportation hub linking Central Asia to Europe, as their foreign minister wrote in the Wall Street Journal yesterday. Both developments improve chances of the Trans-Caspian pipeline to become a reality. But you are write: The US and the EU should show more involvement.
Stratfor is about as useful as Debka.
Steve, thank you for this site, which has made me research further on the subject of oil and those behind the scenes as you describe in your book.
With that in mind, please examine this book link below at some point and let me know your expert opinion on another author's behind the scenes look into the oil business and the players in it. Looks like you both have some great information to share.
http://www.amazon.com
>>search for the book, "the energy non-crisis" by Lindsey Williams
Hi Seth, I've looked at a bit of Lindsey Williams' material on line. I'll take a look at the book next time I am in a shop. He seems to be arguing the anti-environmentalist case that there is plenty of oil to be produced in the U.S. I personally don't see that as a conspiracy; there are simply diverging opinions.
Thanks for the comment and best,
Steve
Yeah, Steve, STRATFOR is about as accurate as Strategy Page. Last year they were arguing Iran would have to invade Turkmenistan after Turkmenbashi's death to seize its gas fields and arrest its slide into depression.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home